Extraditing Julian Assange to the US would be exposing him to serious danger, so Ecuador's decision to grant the Wikileaks founder asylum in its London embassy is well founded, the left-liberal daily The Guardian writes: "Why, Assange's critics charge, would he be more likely to be extradited to the US from Sweden than from Britain, Washington's patsy, notorious for its one-sided extradition arrangements. There are specific risks in Sweden - for example, its fast-track 'temporary surrender' extradition agreement it has with the US. But the real point is that Assange is in danger of extradition in both countries - which is why Ecuador was right to offer him protection. ... If the Swedish government pledged to block the extradition of Assange to the US for any WikiLeaks-related offence (which it has the power to do) - and Britain agreed not to sanction extradition to a third country once Swedish proceedings are over - then justice could be served. But with loyalty to the US on the line, Assange shouldn't expect to leave the embassy any time soon." (22/08/2012)
» full article (external link, English)
More from the press review on the subject » International Relations, » Crime, » Justice, » United Kingdom, » Sweden, » Latin Amerika, » U.S.
All available articles from » Seumas Milne
Who's saying what » Wikileaks on trial