The Times reflects on the possibilities and limits of genetic engineering, and calls for a public debate on the subject: "[Genetic engineering] will allow far more accurate prediction of, and screening for, conditions such as diabetes, heart disease and many cancers, even before symptoms are visible. ... The barrier to progress is no longer technological. It is that, as a nation, we have ... yet to arrive at settled ethical positions. The principal concern is about access to information. Though the individual will have an interest in his doctor reading the information, he may not - indeed if the news is bad, he will not - wish the same access for his insurer or his employer. ... Will we permit a genetic predisposition to be entered as a plea in mitigation in court? Even when the question of access to information is settled, there are very many thorny questions about the uses to which genetic information can legitimately be put. ... For example, should a parent have the right to have their children tested for diseases that will emerge in adult life? What if a parent refuses to consent to a test that is clearly in their child's best interest? ... Our scientific learning is running ahead of our ethical wisdom, and this is now an argument that needs the fresh air of public debate." (09/02/2009)
» full article (external link, English)
More from the press review on the subject » Health Policy, » Health and Medicine, » Science / Research, » United Kingdom