The speedy change of political terminology that has come about as a result of the fall of the Egyptian president is annoying, writes David Hugendick in the liberal weekly Die Zeit: "The despots are on one side, the West and its allies, to which Hosni Mubarak himself long belonged, on the other. ... Now however with the revolt in Egypt this image has become redundant. The world is screaming: Mubarak is a dictator. ... The former rebels have now become demonstrators and protestors, the protestors are now critics of the regime, the critics have become opponents and are now being referred to as freedom fighters in some places. All within just a few days. The vocabulary of Tahrir Square now dominates our way of talking in the same way that for a long time one used the language of realpolitik in the West to speak of Mubarak's regime. For the past 30 years, that is. Yesterday realism, today revolution. Thrilling times! And yet somewhat opportunist. ... To be fair it should be said that it's better to gain insight late than never. However it's distressing that it takes a fullscale uprising for that to happen." (10/02/2011)
» full article (external link, German)
More from the press review on the subject » International Relations, » Languages, » Human rights, » Germany, » Global, » Egypt
All available articles from » David Hugendick