In an essay published by the New York Times, renowned intellectual and left-wing liberal politician Michael Ignatieff expressed regret that he initially supported the war in Iraq. Robert Misik says he can't understand why Ignatieff makes the distinction between thinking intellectuals and acting politicians in his essay. "Admittedly, the new politically active intellectual is more an intellectual politician. Ideally, he knows more than the average politician about the complex nature of the world and the aporia of social systems, but unlike 'pure' intellectuals at the end of the day he will make a decision, as a commentator and as an advisor. He is no doubt subject to a different set of incentives and an entirely different type of pressure than a politician, but at the end of the day the two roles aren't that different from each other... Those who make decisions can't rule out mistakes. However, the consequences are different. The intellectual makes a fool of himself at worst, whereas if everything goes wrong for the politician he may end up destroying his career. However, at least they survive. Unfortunately, the same doesn't always apply to the objects of the mistake - sometimes they die." (10/08/2007)
» Artykuł (Link zewnętrzny, niemiecki)
Więcej z przeglądu prasy na temat » Stosunki międzynarodowe, » Polityka bezpieczeństwa / Kryzys / Wojna, » USA, » Cały świat, » Irak
Wszystkie dostępne teksty » Robert Misik