At a conference in Munich in 1938, Britain and France allowed Hitler's annexation of the Sudetenland, purportedly to save peace. Representatives from Czechoslovakia were not allowed to participate and felt betrayed by their allies. The US-based Anglo-Dutch writer Ian Buruma asks in a commentary for the liberal daily Sme what lessons the West has learned from the failed appeasement policy of the Munich Agreement signed 70 years ago. "After two catastrophic wars, Europeans decided to build institutions that would make military conflict redundant. ... In the United States, meanwhile, Munich has had a very different resonance. Here it has fed the Churchillian illusions of many a 'war president'. ... Americans (with initial reluctance) had to do the dirty work: in Yugoslavia, in Kuwait, against Saddam Hussein or in the war against terror. ... European diplomacy ... has strengthened the democracies of central and eastern Europe. ... But are the Europeans ready to go to war in the interest of others, for Example Georgia or Ukraine? It is time for European democracies to make up their minds. They can remain dependent on the protection of the US or they can develop the capacity to defend Europe, however they wish to define it, themselves. ... Europeans will probably just muddle on until a serious crisis forces them to act, by which time it could well be too late." (26/09/2008)
» Artykuł (Link zewnętrzny, słowacki)
Więcej z przeglądu prasy na temat » Stosunki międzynarodowe, » Polityka bezpieczeństwa / Kryzys / Wojna, » Historia, » Europa, » USA
Wszystkie dostępne teksty » Ian Buruma