Afghanistan two years after the Taliban takeover

Two years ago the Taliban entered Kabul and retook control of Afghanistan following the withdrawal of Western troops from the country. Now millions of its inhabitants are living in dire poverty. The situation is particularly difficult for women and girls, who among other things have been banned from studying and higher education, and are only allowed to travel with an escort. How can the situation be improved?

Open/close all quotes
Politiken (DK) /

Between a rock and a hard place

The choice between isolating the Kabul regime or negotiating with it is not an easy one, Politiken notes:

“There is no easy way out of this dilemma. But we can start by saying that the status quo is a dead end. Perhaps it feels better to turn our backs on the Taliban completely, but the wrong people are paying the price. Moreover, supporting humanitarian victims is not the same as legitimising the regime that caused their suffering. So we must be pragmatic and try to reach out to less dark forces than those who are currently using isolation to quietly turn back the clock to the Middle Ages.”

Ilta-Sanomat (FI) /

Recognition could alleviate the suffering

In Ilta-Sanomat's opinion, recognising the Taliban regime could be the best option:

“Recognition of the Taliban would be a bitter pill to swallow. But engaging in negotiations and releasing the former Afghan regime's frozen assets could alleviate the worst hardship. It could even improve the situation of women and girls if the Taliban could be persuaded to make concessions at the same time. ... The international community could offer the Taliban recognition, but not without getting something in return. The conditions must be strict: human rights, equality and good governance must come first.”

La Croix (FR) /

France must stick to generous asylum policy

Anticipating a protracted crisis, La Croix praises France's response:

“Given the extreme weakness of the opposition, this state of affairs could last for years. As long as that is the case, France must continue its generous policy of welcoming Afghan asylum seekers. Refugee status enables them to escape their precarious situation and start a new life.”

Irish Examiner (IE) /

At least there's a little more stability now

The Irish Examiner points out that economically and security-wise the situation in Afghanistan has improved:

“The Taliban face no significant opposition that could topple them. They have avoided internal divisions by falling in line behind their ideologically unbending leader. They have kept a struggling economy afloat, in part by holding investment talks with capital-rich regional countries, even as the international community withholds formal recognition. They have improved domestic security through crackdowns on armed groups such as the Islamic State.”

La Repubblica (IT) /

Dictatorship and poverty

The people of Afghanistan barely benefit from the country's current relative stability, comments Alberto Cairo, Red Cross envoy to Afghanistan, in La Repubblica:

“Afghanistan is a theocratic dictatorship. ... The mullahs and mawlawis can freely interpret the Islamic scriptures, discussion is not possible, Shiites and Isma'ilites are labelled heretics and hardly tolerated. The Pashtun ethnic group dominates, Tajiks, Hazaras and Uzbeks are excluded. The Taliban claim to have the support of the entire population (which is not true). ... World Bank reports say inflation is down, the currency is stable, tax revenues are up. ... That may be so. But there have never been so many poor people.”

Le Monde (FR) /

Bring Afghan women to safe countries

More must be done to help the women of Afghanistan, urges Parwana Paikan, Deputy Chief of Mission at the Afghan Embassy in France, which does not recognise the Taliban:

“It's time for the world to stop merely 'following' the situation in Afghanistan. ... To bring about positive changes in Afghanistan, efforts must be coordinated, diplomatic channels must be exploited, all economic and political levers must be set in motion and dissuasive sanctions must be implemented. In addition, it is important to support the resettlement and asylum of Afghan women and girls in countries that offer them security and opportunities for a better life, while preparing them to play an important role in future decision-making for their country.”

Frankfurter Rundschau (DE) /

Effectively left to its own devices

The West has hardly any influence in the country now, the Frankfurter Rundschau comments:

“The Taliban are laying claim to the many billions of dollars in state assets that have been frozen, but they are not prepared to make any compromises in return. Or even to enter into talks. ... At any rate, the Biden administration is hardly bothering with Afghanistan any more. ... And Germany and the other EU states are basically following the US example. In the current context they had no choice - after all, they were only ever in the passenger seat. Besides, the Taliban make no distinction between the US and Europe. Hence, Germany and the other EU states have no choice but to leave Afghanistan to the Taliban.”

Libération (FR) /

The key lies in the economy

Europe must develop an independent and business-oriented strategy, former EU ambassador Jean-François Cautain demands in Libération:

“In the run-up to the 2024 US presidential elections, the Biden administration must stick to its course of combining sanctions and humanitarian aid. Europe is not subject to this constraint and must develop its own strategy. The key lies in helping the Afghan economy get back on its feet. Only a revival of the economy can overcome the current humanitarian crisis and thus limit the exodus to Europe.”