Ebola outbreak in Congo: how to respond?
The Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda are grappling with an outbreak of the deadly Ebola virus. Several hundred suspected cases and over a hundred deaths have been reported so far, prompting the World Health Organisation (WHO) to declare an international public health emergency. There are no vaccines or treatments for the rare strain of the virus that is currently spreading.
Fill surveillance gaps
Polityka argues that infection surveillance needs to be more effective:
“This doesn't mean the world is on the brink of a new pandemic. Ebola is not resurfacing as a virus with pandemic potential, but rather as a warning. Fortunately, despite its enormous media presence, it spreads far more slowly than coronavirus or the flu. But this is precisely why the current situation is causing experts such concern. If even a relatively immobile pathogen can spread on such a scale before being officially identified, it means that there are still major gaps in the epidemiological surveillance systems.”
Focus on facts and science
Pharmacologist Jean-Michel Dogné explains in Le Soir what a sensible response would be:
“Not all viruses are potential Covid viruses. Scientists must continue to provide thorough and clear explanations, acknowledging the uncertainty without oversimplifying matters. Social media platforms can no longer ignore their role in spreading misleading or polarising content. … Andes hantavirus, Bundibugyo Ebola: these names should not trigger panic or fuel delusions. ... Between denial and hysteria, there is a third, more challenging path based on facts, moderation and critical thinking. Yet we continue to collectively ignore this path.”