Drone attack on Moscow

Several residential buildings in Moscow were damaged by drone attacks on Tuesday, although no one was injured. Russian President Putin accused Ukraine and spoke of an act of terrorism. Ukraine, however, has denied direct involvement. Commentators discuss the consequences.

Open/close all quotes
De Telegraaf (NL) /

Civilian targets are taboo

The fact that apartment buildings were also hit could undermine the West's trust in Ukraine, De Telegraaf warns:

“Of course Ukraine has every right to defend itself against Russia's war of aggression. This can go beyond simply expelling Russian troops from occupied territories. ... However, the drone attack on Moscow involved civilian targets, including a district where President Putin and some of his supporters live. Ukraine would do better to focus - with its own weapons - on strategic military targets if it wants to avoid eroding support in the West.”

Arkady Dubnov (RU) /

Better not to draw any more red lines

Political journalist Arkady Dubnov analyses Russia's reaction to the drone strike on his Facebook channel:

“Not a single comment from pro-government, let alone state sources on the drone attack in Moscow made mention of the Anglo-Saxon puppeteers manipulating the 'Ukronazis'. ... It looks like a fresh set of language rules from the presidential administration is taking effect. For to link the direct attack by combat drones on the Russian capital with Western instructions would be a damaging allusion to yet another 'red line' that the enemy has dared to cross without risking retribution.”

Slate (FR) /

Major psychological impact

Particular attention must be paid to the intangible effects of such attacks, Slate stresses:

“The psychological and potential political damage cannot be ignored. In theory, these strikes could have a galvanising effect on Russian morale and strengthen popular support for the war against Ukraine. But if the Russian army remains weak on the battlefield and the impending Ukrainian offensive achieves a breakthrough and recaptures kilometres of territory even closer to the Russian border, this incursion into the skies over Moscow could demoralise Russians, making them concretely aware of the war's existence and eager to end it.”

Tageblatt (LU) /

Much-vaunted stability gone

Perhaps now, some people in Russia will begin to question the war propaganda, Moscow correspondent Inna Hartwich writes in Tageblatt:

“They reject responsibility for the war, they justify it and refuse to take it seriously. But it is now coming to their homes in the form of drones. That spreads terror. 'That's right where my son's kindergarten is located: how am I supposed to sleep peacefully now?' many people ask who until now were able to sleep peacefully even though not a thousand kilometres away the kindergartens of other sons and daughters were being bombed by their compatriots. Many Muscovites are only learning through the violence inflicted by drones that President Putin's much-vaunted stability is a thing of the past.”

Echo (RU) /

A fraction of what the Ukrainians are going through

In a Telegram post republished by Echo, Ukrainian film director Alexander Rodnyansky compares the Muscovites' fear over this incident to what Ukrainians are experiencing:

“Believe me, I am not in any way gloating. I can't gloat about drones over [Moscow suburb] Rublevka. ... But tonight Muscovites felt only a tenth if not a hundredth of what Kyiv residents feel EVERY night. And only a millionth of what the residents of Mariupol - or Bakhmut or Avdiivka - experienced. ... The Russian Ministry of Defence, responsible for the bombing of Ukraine and the murder of Ukrainian civilians, called what happened in Moscow an ACT OF TERROR .... Really? Then what should we call what is happening in Ukraine?”

The Times (GB) /

Treading on very thin ice

Ukraine's forces should be wary of attacking Moscow, warns The Times:

“This high-profile operation is bound to make Nato leaders nervous, especially President Biden, who has insisted that Ukraine should not use sophisticated arms provided for its defence to attack Russian soil. Nato is committed to help Ukraine defend itself against aggression, the White House reaffirmed last week. But the alliance is not at war with Russia and intends to keep it that way. Ukraine must be mindful of these concerns.”

Reflex (CZ) /

The damage is truly huge

Reflex has a sense of déjà vu:

“The damage caused by the two drones is not extensive, the Russian authorities have said. But in fact it is huge. As huge as it once was when a small plane piloted by a twenty-year-old amateur flew from Germany to Moscow back in the 1980s. Mathias Rust didn't do any bombing but he landed in the heart of Russia, on its most sacred ground, right in front of the Kremlin on Red Square. That's how poorly the Soviet Union was guarded. And to this day nothing has changed in that regard.”